1 /5 Daniel Martinez: I’m currently in an ongoing legal battle with Armin Jezari over a foreclosure at 513 Cactus Crossing in El Paso, and what I’ve witnessed is not what you’d expect from an attorney with glowing reviews.
Let’s be clear — I filed my lawsuit first. I raised serious concerns about a bankruptcy stay violation, which Mr. Jezari completely ignored. He never responded to me, never addressed the violation, and never attempted to clarify. Instead, he jumped straight to damage control — using court filings not to resolve anything, but to bury the issue and weaponize procedure.
After I nonsuited the case (as allowed by law), he tried to hit me with sanctions — a move meant purely to intimidate me for exercising my rights. That tells you everything. Rather than defend his client’s actions on the merits, Jezari immediately moved to manipulate the system to block further legal scrutiny.
Then came the procedural games: motions to dismiss, answers filled with intimidation language, and efforts to remove a lis pendens I had a right to file. All of this was part of a strategy to make sure the real issue — a wrongful foreclosure under active bankruptcy — never gets examined.
It’s clear: Jezari’s job isn’t about truth or justice. It’s about suppressing evidence and sidestepping liability. And the worst part? These tactics are aimed at a pro se litigant — someone without a lawyer. That’s how the “good ol’ boy” legal club works: they go harder at people who don’t have backup, because they think they can.
This review isn’t about winning or losing. It’s about how far some attorneys will go to protect a client — even if it means misleading the court, threatening a self-represented party, and dodging accountability at every turn.
I’m still in the fight. And now the public gets to see who they’re really dealing with.
