1 /5 Freddy Klayel-Avalos: I saw you’ve already accepted the taser death case from this past Sunday—just days after it happened.
Meanwhile, my case—documented facial fractures, a fractured ankle, ADA violations, excessive force while handcuffed, and dropped charges—was quickly minimized and reframed by you while downplaying the real issues of brutality and rights violations.
Then you told me you’d need to hire Ben Crump at a cost of $20,000, brought up court conservatism, and made it clear through your tone and demeanor that you had no real interest in helping me. You were curt, arrogant, and dismissive from the start.
There’s nothing wrong with making money from your profession that’s what we all do , but, It’s obvious this was never about the strength of the case. It was about visibility, headlines, and fast payouts. You’re not fighting for justice. You’re chasing optics.
Hopefully, you actually help that family out instead of just focusing all about your personal enrichment
Just wanted that on record.
//////follow up response
Thank you for confirming that you were selective — because it reinforces my point exactly.
You invited me in, heard that I had documented facial fractures, a fractured ankle, ADA violations, was punched while handcuffed, and had all charges dropped-and still needed "time" to decide.
Then you took a taser case just days after it happened.
Thats not about being a small firm. Thats about priorities.
You didnt need time-you needed headlines.
I never expected a guarantee. I expected honesty.
What I got was a slow dismissal and then a front-page move.
No hard feelings- I just wanted that contrast on the record for anyone else who walks in expecting something different.
