Law Office of Les D Romo - Georgetown (TX)

1 /5 britt hobbs: Mr. Romo is the most unprofessional attorney I have ever met. He is rude to his clients and not client centered at all. I would hate for my loved ones to have to deal with him upon my passing.

1 /5 Yanelis Leon: This lawyer has had my will since May, and it was still August and he hasn’t done anything with my will. At a certain point he asked me if my husband had a will, he is a very rude person, not professional and did not answer the calls that I made. In August I had the opportunity to make an appointment with him telling him that I was going to pay him for the service, but when I told him to give me my copy that I had paid him and a copy of the contract, he did not want to and at that point I did nothing with him, him as a lawyer it’s useless. I’m so glad that im not the only person who has been treated this way by and unprofessional lawyer and unprepared/unorganized.

5 /5 joe gimenez: Mr. Romo successfully defended our member-owned water supply corporation. The plaintiffs won on a point that agenda items were not listed correctly. Mr. Romo could not be expected to prevail on that point of evidence which occurred years before. However, on the plaintiffs larger petition of voiding a transaction by the corporation, Mr. Romo prevailed with TWO judges in securing "Take Nothing" rulings based on real estate law. That is what any prospective client of Mr. Romos should know about the case -- that on matters of law he prevailed. Also, despite the judge finding that a previous Board had in fact violated agenda prescriptions, the judge did not award attorney fees to the plaintiff. That was another victory for Mr. Romo and our water corporation. Mr. Romo is a very good attorney. By the way, this is the same case mentioned by another reviewer -- Mister Flunker. Of course Mr. Flunker did not mention that he was a plaintiff in the case and his review is nothing more than the sour grapes of a losing party. It is also humorous that Mr. Flunker speaks about Mr. Romos fees. Remember it is Mr. Flunkers lawsuit which forced the water supply corporation to employ Mr. Romo to defend it. Given the much larger stakes involved in the case, Mr. Romos fees were very appropriate.

5 /5 Sharon Legg: Mr. Roma was very responsive and professional in his advice. His expertise and advice was greatly appreciated. I look forward to working with him in the future.

5 /5 Mitch Martin: Les has represented our company for many years and has always conducted himself in an ethical and trust worthy manner. Thru his actions on our behalf, he has demonstrated that he is a knowledgeable and competent attorney. If you need someone who will represent you with passion and commitment, then Les is your man!